Tuesday, May 31, 2011

An Existentialist Community

We cannot often times demand that we have our views being acceded to. However, sometimes things have to be said to infuse it in the consciousness of everyone. I think we do not even have to shout it loud for others to hear. I believe that every Filipino has in him what I think is a grave reality. Probably, the most devastating that we are experiencing in this postmodern age is the apparent indifference that runs across the country. What compounds the problem is the seeming dilution of those values that have been cherished and that have become themselves symbols of our identity. Have you experienced even in our simple day to day activities that we have become reluctant to be forceful to what we usually believe as essentials of our singularity as people. We don’t seem to stop by and open up a little to some unexpected conversations that might come our way every now and then. People have become grumpy themselves when stopped to be asked how they are. It seems that talking with someone we know is a grave violation to some social conventions. Though, this is not a sufficient reason enough to justify that erosion of our values, but they signify something more serious. I can only wish there are Filipinos who can be nationally conscious. Because of some of the unholy things we usually get from televisions these days, Filipinos tend to refocus their minds to something else — entertainment. It is not that this is entirely wrong, but it might be something that we call symptoms and signs that we deny the reality by deviating into that which can occupy our minds and numb our consciousness to stop it from absorbing. Blaise Pascal call it deviation: to flee from something inherently unacceptable because it is absurd. By seeing this, we would hinder from approaching something that we do not like, thereby rendering us anxious of our embracing that thing. So we move away from it by shelling oneself to cover that absurdity. I think we as one nation at one time have experienced existentialist crisis. Filipinos have seen that something that absence of essence in our living. The alienation that Filipinos feel in this existence is what keeps us from doing the things that we do most. We have become busy nationally, but we end up aimlessly. We have not embraced that thing that divides us from accepting a fact and to move on with that fact under our consciousness. The death-consciousness does not mean that our finitude blocks our existence and to accept that hard fact. Though no fault of our own, people begin to see this death-consciousness around them by repeatedly seeing this around: the utter chaotic web of national events, scandals, shameful eventualities, horrendous cataclysmic situations, murders in large scale, and others. The perplexity of these circumstances have rendered us mortal to acknowledge the fact that we know no way out.


September 16, 2006


The Return of a Friend

………Have you had been feeling great anxieties in life? It truly is like being to wait for someone like a medical technologist to take some blood samples from you. You don’t seem to know where the butterflies come from; but you indeed feel it flying around your insides, flapping to escape if chance there is. The days were numbered but saved me from counting it. That day approached as if from nowhere when serendipity only lies some moments away, never nearer but always closer. What an amazing thing it happened; while you were on your own thoughts, a friend but not so a friend until then came with a game card to fill some numbers, and on goes the saying "all’s well that ends well". Heaven knows not of losing someone whom one is a given friend to one. Take it amazingly — who would have thought it possible for humans anyway; such is possible only when it is made possible by Someone who indeed can do that to particular beings like Wilson and Chito………..


September 13, 2006.

The Reason of Which Mine

Oft we seem to undergo some conversational crises. What one speaks has not but all many shades of differing perception on one who hears them. If need be, one has to spend time to delicately weave each stories as to cast them properly. It’d be too unfortunate to fall into a mire of misunderstandings, whence time and effort are to be grabbed because it is necessity itself which forces them be employed. That is in itself harder than one thinks if missed interpretations have set in. So what one does has to be what he thinks can be proper at any time given situation. If silence is a must, then it must be a given and that somehow it is best to suit it as long as it can. One must then try to accept that keeping yourself to yourself is more than what one can imagine — nevertheless it has in itself some benefit. As I often think: "Silence is of benefit," must have some goodwill over matters more rough around the edges.

August 15, 2006

The Day That Ends

Ends do not delay; they come at an instant’s request. If it be known in advance, how happy would one be. But, it seems that man’s lot is lost of much of knowing when. We forlornly are sure that we do not. How bad indeed if we are without hope… it is vain in fleeting times when harrowing descent of recollection of our finitude is at our doorsteps…knocking everytime when attention does not pay a heed….thus, man is like me and man is me….pay not and I am ceased….

June 6th, 2006.

The Day I Was Shouted

Nothing seems to be so fearsome as being unguarded at all at an event. Unfortunate it is when you are left with you beastly id. Even how much you conceal it, it will surface and resurface at the most peak of weakness. Though time and age will temper it, it will die down not so easily. However, if you believe in Christian virtue, things might be not as desperate as it might seem to suggest. Grace is essentially existent. I could be as much barbaric as I was before. Things like when you were insulted face-blank might have turned me into another Atilla the Hun at any minute; however, as much as I would think it otherwise, it was not other than gracious gift of God to sustain amidst insurmountable ego-killing scene. I could only wonder why I was at peace.

I can only rely on one thing to "throw back at" if something hard hits me at the head — prayer! For me and for someone…….


August 2nd, 2006

Trilogy Relationship of 1Kings 21 and Matthew 5

The two chapter verses are parallel in substance owing to the fact that both are planar contrariety. The first taken from the reading of First Kings is read as injustice on the part of a lowly personage whose circumstance happens him to conflict with a ruling King. Now, the reading today appose this account during the time of the prophet Elijah with the radical commandment of the Christ in the new covenant. The juxtaposition becomes contrasting giving the narrative of the Old Testament a concrete example with that of the call of Christ for total self-dying, whereby self-sacrifice in a total adherence to Christ’s invitation for His Kingdom. Now the Psalm, which was taken from the fifth chapter, gives divine attribute-characteristics of the nature of a God who does not turn a blind eye. The just One whose essence is justice personified. Then the trio begins to map a theological mosaic of God who invites everyone regardless of accidence and person to follow Himself, though how much difficult it is, in His Kingdom and progress in the virtues in this temporal sphere, always seeking that which is not for the world and in the world, forsaking it in the hope that salvation comes to those who have conquered the race and accomplished it. In the end, whose injustice has been done shall come to him salvation.

The Hour I Lost It

I cannot even begin asking a question if ever you have experienced losing something that is almost close to water or air, something that is dear to your heart. The pain is almost insurmountable. What is paradoxical and ironic is that it is only a thing. A thing! If you tend to look back before placing yourself after you got that thing, it would look as though it is stupendously ridiculous. Nothing could be more stupid than to think that you are plagued by a thought of a thing. But, it happened; it occurred. I cannot shake it off, it ailed me.

Oftentimes, we become wounded with the thought of a material poverty. That is the physicality of an object, which other people would find it helplessly nonsensical. However, we failed to grasp that there is a reality that lies behind the materiality, the corporeality of an object. There is a meaning behind what we usually see as such. This is what happened when I lost my USB, a universal serial bus. I left it. It pained me.

Here, the pain does not arise from the fact that the objectivity of that thing matters. However, what gives it more definition is the fact that it has something that is more precious than the copper and steel in itself. I grieved when I lost my files. The files that I had been looking forward to possessing. The words I longed to read and learn. The literature that my gaze had been directed for so long now. How did I lose it; how did I allow it to happen. Constantly, I blame myself. I have always blamed myself because of my inability to be conscious at all times and at all costs! Why did I forget it dangling on the USB port?

Have you found it silly that I had been always happy because I possessed it? My mind was feeling the security of having these things in a handy gadget. I had that almost-like contented attitude and confidence of owning things I have always wanted to hold. I felt bold enough knowing that I know I had already it!

In this time of Lent, I have realized that God somehow used that event to let me come to terms, to hand me over to my folly. I had to learn a hard fact: nothing in the world can man hold that is more dear to him than God himself. Nothing can close in the horizon of seeing beyond what you can know - to know that the place of God comes where the knowledge of man attenuates. God lurks in the fringes of man’s unknowingness.


Wednesday, May 25, 2011

Sundays at Work

When I started to work in a call center, Sundays have become ordinary to me. This means that the ordinary is defined by what we consider as usual and casual. Usual and casual further mean that there are days which we do not consider as common. The commonality here is when what we usually does and think is repeated for a number of days, and a stop is imposed to "breathe" and respite is given. The ordinary is featured by things we regularly do and think and that society is featured sometimes to give condition to this reality. There might be different shades of the way we consider things as usual and casual, but as we approach the generality of things, we find that there are common elements we are under with. One such thing is the number of days in the calendar and regularity of seasons and holidays. It seems to me that the invention of the calendar is an importance that regulated man, and in so doing, in a certain sense, has dictated man. In the ancient civilizations, like Egypt, the patterns of life is governed by the rise and fall of bodies of water, i.e. the Nile River, and in China, the celestial arrangement of stars, planets, comets, and phenomena. The Magis were foremost biblical examples of star-gazers, who took the appearances of stars as signs.

The number of days in a week is divided by what we have usually called the work days and weekends. What comes to mind in the former is a grueling day of toil, and the latter, a cessation and relaxation - a period in a long sentence. There is a stop, which upsets as the continuation begun. This stoppage is a necessary condition toward the word health. The progression in the realm of reality, in the area of the noumena, is a recapitulation of the condition of man's being. The reality of man is a reality of the universe. The universe seeks a balance in its various unstable processes, while man seeks to pacify his burdened heart, in his unceasing quest toward what we call equilibrium. In the vast reality of the universe, what upsets a stable noumenon demands neither gain nor loss (a condition of self-sufficiency). In man, this constant seeking is manifested in the exertion of effort in the days he gives himself to, while in the two days that follows the five, it gives man time to breathe, to cancel out the energy.

But, the feeling of working on a Sunday has left me feeling peaceful.

Saturday, April 30, 2011

The Royal Wedding of a Prince and a Commoner

I have had the time of watching the Royal Wedding on the 29th of April from the time that Prince William departed from Clarence House until the second kiss they made on the balcony of Buckingham Palace. I could not help noticing the kind of elements that the watchers had commented on with the event: the most part of it concerns only these - the mysterious gown, which was concealed from the public eyes, and the tiara. The ring did not take that much airtime and much less the readings and the homily given by the Bishop of London. No word was given about the significance of the wedding register being kept in the sanctuary of William the Confessor. No historical background as to why. If there might have been some explanation this was done so, it might have been said by a different anchor or guest from another network or so.

The lens of the cameras zeroed in on Catherine "Kate" Middleton. This concept that the wedding happened for the bride is somewhat misplaced. I would say that this wedding happened because both persons in their freedom had decided to declare this public within the precinct of the sacred; it is not the Church (in this case the Anglican Church) which created the marriage but a man and a woman who bring this to the ear of the Church to be validly acknowledged. The requirement of both declarations is needed to satisfy the legitimacy and validity of marriage. Nowhere did this become a unilateral act.

It is so sorry to think that the concept of marriage has shifted much nowadays from -transcendental-social-sacramental in nature to a more utilitarian-commercial-secularistic experiment. No wonder that the dissolution of any marriages and the rise of divorce appear as something common and regular among the public ear. It is just so hard to combine what appears to be the accepted reality of some that, on one hand, royal marriages only reflects the general fact about marriages of the general population and, on the other, the symbol of stability of British Monarchy in the passage of time. Who could not help wondering that in the Victorian Era, the enduring reality of normative traditional family life was all over the House of Hanover in the 18the century, and in our time, the House of Windsor, though divorces became common only later. In one way, the British Monarchy can reflect the general realities of regular families and individuals, but at the same time, it should reflect the highest nobles, the highest aspirations of not just the British, but any persons at large. The political institution of the British Monarchy did not just happen yesterday, but it came down to us in changing worlds. It speaks of an enduring reality that helps us understand that there are some things that will remain.

The latest showcase of this marriage is always a window into the future for the Prince just marrying is a successor of the present Queen. Though he will be a mere symbolic monarchy (if things will remain as is), he will still represent the institution, the British "ancien regime", which always arrests our attention as we are enticed into living only in the present without any point of reference of the past. We do not pray and hope in an unhappy ending of the couple; we rejoice in their perpetual vow as they continue to hold on to those words spoken once and for all in Westminster. The bad thing, though, is that the church they belong had long ago condoned divorce and remarriages, which fly before the face of Jesus' very command. They have to go back to the time before Henry VIII singularly annulled his marriage with Catherine of Aragon, during which time he was still the Defensores Fidei. They have to go back listening to the teaching of marriage of the ancient Church handed to the Catholic Church of today. If they had chosen to bind themselves in the precinct of their religion, then it is but correct to say that they had relinquished their own freedom to the freedom of the one which acknowledges what they had declared. This other freedom does not judge from the arbitrariness of the same kind who wished to relinquished their freedom, but of a different kind, a kind that comes from without - a without that may bring something new, something different from what we have commonly accepted. This something from outside should be harbored through a means that channels this something new and something different. It is only but logical that we should listen to this channel through which we listen this news that comes from outside, an extraneous reality that demands and coerces us and imposes grievous ends. However, we have come to know that this extra gives love, hope, and faith. It is consoling to know that what this extra is does not leave us to our own, to the caprice of our wills, but journeys with us, walks with us, and talks with us. It dialogues with our weakness and with our strengths. Who knows us from the beginning and pulls us always and always from the pit of darkness.

There is one thing that we know: the secularists cannot claim a total victory; they have yet to undergo the corrosive test of time. They have yet to verify their experiment and conclude from the premises. Until then, we have to hold on to what we have held so far, to the tradition that we have been handed with. In these times that our dearest beliefs have been assaulted, when we are closed in from all directions, there is only thing to do, though it is hard, very hard to follow through, but to stand as witness, to act as that news that brings gladness to others who have started to accept the ideas of the enemies. Nowhere this is more felt than in the events that we have just seen lately, the wedding of two promising individuals.

It is our prayer; it is hope.

Sunday, January 16, 2011

Annunziata

"Et ingressus angelus ad eam dixit : Ave gratia plena : Dominus tecum : benedicta tu in mulieribus. Quæ cum audisset, turbata est in sermone ejus, et cogitabat qualis esset ista salutatio."

So says the Gospel of St. Luke. The text was taken from its first Chapter after the account of Zachary's encounter of the same Archangel Gabriel. The contrast of the two encounters is evident: the unbelief of the priest of Aaron to the belief of the Virgin, the young woman in the prophecy of Isaiah to King Hezekiah in his stubborness. We could ask what could possibly be in the mind of the author when he recounts these events? That the disbelief of Zachary has been arrested by the consent of the woman to and through whom salvation comes; that movement from the downhill of one's disobedience is uplifted by the simple words of the seemingly naive and ignorant country girl: "And Mary said: Behold the handmaid of the Lord: be it done to me according to your word." This striking difference is held by one denominator - the common will of God - He pushes the hour actively into the history of man in that historical moment of His salvific plan: the rise of the precursor of the Gospel to give voice to that prophetic signal of Isaiah (The voice of one crying in the desert: Prepare the way of the Lord, make straight in the wilderness the paths of our God. Every valley shall be exalted, and every mountain and hill shall be made low, and the crooked shall become straight, and the rough ways plain. And the glory of the Lord shall be revealed, and all flesh together shall see, that the mouth of the Lord has spoken. The voice of one, saying: Cry. Isaiah 40: 3-6) and the Word: "And the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us (and we saw his glory, the glory as it were of the only begotten of the Father), full of grace and truth" (John 1: 14). The noticeable dissonance of the two texts finds its synthesis in the acknowledgment of the Baptist as he on the riverbed of the Jordan in Bethania pointed his finger to the One who came for baptism saying: "Behold the Lamb of God. Behold him who takes away the sin of the world. This is he of whom I said: After me there comes a man, who is preferred before me: because he was before me. And I knew him not: but that he may be made manifest in Israel, therefore am I come baptizing with water. (John 1: 29-31)"

What can we make of this Zachary in the temple? Of his situation and person, what can we gleam from him?

My thoughts do not pretend of a biblical scholar's, and I am simply sharing my own simple meditation from the point of a faithful. The biblical texts come to us not as a subordinate under the whim of anyone who dissects it nor an imposing master that enslaves and coerces us at the cost and expense of our freedom. The scriptures arrives as a gift and offering of God to share in His life - His triuned life. Through the Holy Writ, we are given a window into the eternal life of the three persons in one.

The person of Zachary finds its different expressions and forms in the movement of man in his endless search of explanation to the reality of his history. And, not just to explicate reality but toward the vestibule of understanding - the understanding of what comes to us from without; the understanding of what imposes upon us. Man is circumscribed by his own limitations, in his own limited capacities. Therefore, it is for this reason, of man's search of comprehension of things that surround him, that Kant explains that the subject is not in himself passive before the thing-in-itself but actively constructs in his mind the elements to explain the things before him, we find that Zachary could not simply connect and assimilate the outside and revealing reality of God and what was before him with the algorithm of reality he has simply come to accept and subjectively constructed: "And Zachary said to the angel: Whereby shall I know this? For I am an old man, and my wife is advanced in years. (Luke 1:18)"

Our knowing of things comes in direct contact to a thing not from our own. The mind that seeks rational explanation is in itself good, our constant and ceaseless restlessness to grasp the highest and the most elusive of things square with the sublime nobility of our being created by God and bearing His own imprint. This unremitting aspirant to the truth seeks to know that who is truth Himself, the logos in His countenance: "And he said: Let us make man to our image and likeness, and let him have dominion over the fishes of the sea, and the fowls of the air, and the beasts, and the whole earth, and every creeping creature that moves upon the earth. (Genesis 1: 26-27)".

Where did Zachary fail?

There is always this danger of man to surround himself with what he considers the given. The natural rhythm of life radically imposes in Zachary the limits of his view of reality. With this kind of supposition is dogmatically asserted and taken to the extreme, man encloses himself, walls himself up, which ends up limiting his horizon and his aspirations. He delimits himself to the exclusion of anything that might contradict his paradigm. Zachary which in his heart does not open himself up to that transcendent activity of the intervenor of his reality risks a fall of his own. He is a priest the dispenser and mediator of man to God, who should have better known this mystery, but could not accept that his God could work even within his own world. This was his sin, and this will be ours too.

This an error of our time, which Christians can easily be swayed. This positivism of our culture that accepts only the scientific method of testing and experimentation as reality and given, then we, too, are on the slippery slope of muteness. When we become dumb, we are in a state of division with our relations and with our surroundings. We are in a failure to be known, heard, and understood. Like the Tower of Babel, this points to the effects of personal sin or the sins of history.

To be saved, we have to let God puncture this enclosure, this hardening of our minds and our hearts to let this revelation penetrate our understanding. In the process of subordinating ourselves (shift of our common view at sometimes a great loss and pain of those things we accrue to enhance our ego) to the will of God, we surrender to Him those things that inhibit us from "going into the House of the Lord (Psalm 121)", to the joy of meeting with the Lord.

The all-holy Virgin.

Mary was kneeling when the angel visited her; she in prayer was humble before the Lord. Mary lives near the boundary of the geographical area which Israel has considered the gift of their election. She lives under the threat of the influence of the gentiles and unbelievers - Romans, Greeks, and Persians. The odds were not on her side. The circumstances and the repercussions of her Yes would have run her into the Mosaic Law, whose rigid interpretation of the local Rabbi, could get her stoned to death. While Zachary lived within the shadow of the temple, closer to the epicenter of the Jewish life, the blessed Virgin only knew too well the life of rabbinic faith in the inconsequent Nazareth; while the office of the priesthood of Zachary symbolized in its liturgical act the prayer of the nation of Israel, Mary was in her tiny room down on her knees for her personal devotion. Zachary had all the privileges attached to his being a priest, father, and man, Mary was to the eyes of all a woman, weak, and insignificant.

In the life of faith, salvation is seen in the eyes of the anawim, the poor of hearts, which was concretized in the remnants of Israel during the time of the Babylonian captivity of Israel. These were stripped of their political rights under the guardian of a vicar of the king of Chaldea. To these remnants, the vision of recapturing Jerusalem and their lands - thus salvation and redemption from sin in the new dispensation - was most clear and strong. Thus, the expectation of the messiah is harbored in the hearts of those who are awake - in the constant conversation day and night of the One who comes without news, in those who kept their lamps burning as they await their bridegroom. At the time of Jesus' coming, all Israel was on expectation of the rise of the messiah, but only the rarest of the few had heard it clearly. Whereas the enclosure of Zechariah of his own world isolates him of this expectation, Mary in her heart had heard it audibly. Thus, when the angel spoke to her, she knew in her heart that it has come - the way to Calvary has begun in her little village, the sign of contradiction is clearly initiated in her own space, time, and flesh.

The texts of the Annunciation finds its most credible witness and authentic interpretation in the life of the saints, in whose lives God is borne again and again, in whose lives incarnated the word addressed by the angel. The constant danger of a society that functions only by its own knowing, doing, and acting is undoubtedly on the road to its own demise and perdition. Only in the constant listening to the word of God, thus, man is able to reorient its path to the way to God, to a new of way of seeing and knowing things not from our hands but from the might hand of the Lord.


Monday, October 11, 2010

Habbakuk-Psalm.95-2.Timothy-Luke

On this Sunday's readings, faith is subserved by the dimension of time; the immanence into which faith bears itself up requires the aspect of waiting, of anticipating, of expecting, and of suspending. Habbakuk at which time he has found himself amidst the destruction, violence, contention, and strife in the land so dear to him shows us our impatience to grasp what we long though it be noble and essential. In the quickness of our asking things to come in our own way is the inability of ourselves to stay on a specific part of history, to bridge the gap from what we do not wish to look and gaze to that of the vision of peace, prosperity, and goodness.


In the life of faith, in the midst of God amidst the vicissitudes of change, of time and space in its shifting phenomena, the Psalmist commended us the joy of living in our journey in the dusty road of the "desert". We are invited to the "joyful noise to the rock of our salvation!" Within the accidental nature of living is the essential nucleus of faith, which this singularity is a radiating source of happiness. Thus, today does not pull us down to its ugly realities but that the belief which finds its completion in the tomorrow to come has come to the today and energizes us. The painful experience of the Prophet does not tarry our movement to the Lord, does not suspend us from kneeling and bowing to the Lord.


The question then arises as to why does one find still that unbreakable thread of joy within the seemingly pointless and endless doom and failures and frustrations? The answer is found in 95th song of the Psalm: "harden not your hearts". Essentially, in this "softening" of heart to the Lord we find that ubiquitously wondrous life that sustains us. This mildening if you were harks us back to the listening to the Word - to the kneeling to hear: "O come, let us worship and bow down, let us kneel before the LORD, our Maker!" The confidence one feels under the truthful Word is summed up in the words of the Prophet upon receiving the response of God: "For still the vision awaits its time; it hastens to the end -- it will not lie. If it seem slow, wait for it; it will surely come, it will not delay."In our attitude toward that which we focus our ears now gives us the strength to live that belief of which we bear. Thus, it does not matter to the person who has the eyes of faith if time and space and history plunge us into the darkest hours and vileful situations. For the Lord does not push us away, but toils with us in seemingly human way of waiting and anticipating.


If in the point of view of the Prophet, one is justified in his act of faith, in the consistency and perseverance of his heart, the community receives this individuality and particularity of a personal conviction of that belief now that is shared in common in the Ekklesia, the Church. It is within the Church that the Apostle to the Gentiles in his admonition to Timothy in his second letter. In so much that the Church is large enough to include all races, nationalities, political affiliations, and gender, it finds its definite and concrete unity in the Episkopoi, the Bishop, who presides within the differences and persuasions inherent in the realities of the community. In this cathedra, the seat of the overseer's teaching, the bishop exercises his ministry in the "today" of the Church but listening to the "before" of the tradition. This traditio of the Church is summed up in the Pauline words: "Follow the pattern of the sound words which you have heard from me, in the faith and love which are in Christ Jesus".


It is then in the Church, in the most particular way, in the office of the Bishop, that the content of the Gospel is most heard and is shared by the faithful surrounding him. Just as Paul had instructed Timothy to "guard the truth that has been entrusted to you by the Holy Spirit who dwells within us", so too the common faithful should stand firm of the evangelio that has been given and heard in an act of that unitas.


It is this faith that is objective in one way and subjective in the other that finds its expression in the Gospel of Luke. Is it not our longing itself, in the deepest part of our hearts that we vocalize what the Apostles have found in their beings: "Increase our faith!"? Amidst the uncertainties of life, we do not hinge ourselves in the prevalent dictum of a society in change. The rapidity of life's successive events and circumstances will find man confused; oftentimes we are tossed in the ravages of conflicting ideas and thoughts that challenge our cherished values. It is in only in that mustard seed of faith which gives us impulse to bring about the grand works of the Lord, the saving power of God in the world gone awry. This attitude of faith is given life in the words of the Lord: "We are unworthy servants; we have only done what was our duty". It is this profound conviction in our hearts nurtured by that truth, which sustains us and to which our will has been anchored and our intellect is focused that we travail in the valley of tears, in the world we oftentimes desolates and is desolate. In that faith spoken as words of necessity of the Prophet to bring about the Kingdom, which finds true manifestation and image of the Church in sojourn on earth, in the unique sacramental way professed in the office of the Bishop, and in that mustard seed which is determinate beginning and source of that which gives rise to wonderful things of the Lord, that the three readings radiate from a sole source in the Triune God. Thus, we can say "Let us come into his presence with thanksgiving; let us make a joyful noise to him with songs of praise!"


Sunday, June 27, 2010

Introduction to the Covenant of Sinai

The locus of the Covenant of Sinai is the handing of the Decalogue of God to Moses, or what has been commonly handed down as Ten Commandments. To better understand the event, which Judaism and Christianity has considered as the foundation of the moral life, then, let us take a look on the historical background of the Exodus of the Israelites.

God does not abandon His people, and He had heard their cries. So, Moses was sent to redeem to save them from the oppression of the Pharaoh. With the hesitancy of Moses, God worked before him wonders using his staff. And for this, he was accompanied by his brother, who met him, while he was about to leave Midian.

Before all Egyptians, Moses proclaimed the wonders of Yahweh and showed them His power. The nine plagues were succeeded by the death of the firstborn of the Egyptians and because of this, Ramses, the Pharaoh of that time, granted them liberty. Is it not the same that Jesus was to die to liberate us? Is the death of the firstborn son of the Pharaoh a reminder of what was to happen in the Messianic times?

The exodus of the ten tribes was a logistical problem for Moses that he earnestly cried out to God for help. But God does not abandon His plan; He opened the sea for them to pass. For three months, they came to the wilderness of Sinai from Raphidim; and, eventually was brought before Horeb, the holy mountain of God. On this mountain, God will give them the covenant, and not just an ordinary covenant - a pact between the God and His people. Isn't this the same when Jesus had to climb up the mountain of Tabor to give the new covenant? When Jesus was illuminating with glory and with His conversations with Elijah and Moses, so Moses' face was glowing with his conversation with Yahweh upon receiving the Law. Jesus is the Law-made-Man, while Moses carried the Law for the people.

Sinai has been called the mountain of God. "The name is now given to the triangular peninsula lying between the desert of Southern Palestine, the Red Sea, and the gulfs of Akabah and Suez, with an area of about 10,000 square miles, which was the scene of the forty years' wandering of the Israelites after the Exodus from Egypt." From the land of Egypt, Moses led the nation of Israel into the heart of Sinai; to enter Canaan directly from the south, it was risky, since they would cross the land of the Philistines (who are warlike), while at the southeast, "the less formidable Amalacites are the only inimical tribes and are easily overcome thanks to the intercession of Moses." The wandering lasted forty years. In their journey, the prophet of Yahweh brought them at the foot of the mountain (Jabel Musa or Jabel ), where God would meet them and make a covenant with them. They had prepared themselves for three days and washed their clothes in preparation of the visit.

The Decalogue, in which the prefix deca- means ten and logos a word, has been traditionally divided into 10 precepts. "

The Supreme Law-Giver begins by proclaiming His Name and His Titles to the obedience of the creature man: "I am the Lord, thy God. . ." The laws which follow have regard to God and His representatives on earth (first four) and to our fellow-man (last six).

  • Being the one true God, He alone is to be adored, and all rendering to creatures of the worship which belongs to Him falls under the ban of His displeasure; the making of "graven things" is condemned: not all pictures, images, and works of art, but such as are intended to be adored and served (First).

  • Associated with God in the minds of men and representing Him, is His Holy Name, which by the Second Commandment is declared worthy of all veneration and respect and its profanation reprobated.

  • And He claims one day out of the seven as a memorial to Himself, and this must be kept holy (Third).

  • Finally, parents being the natural providence of their offspring, invested with authority for their guidance and correction, and holding the place of God before them, the child is bidden to honour and respect them as His lawful representatives (Fourth)."

The precepts which follow are meant to protect man in his natural rights against the injustice of his fellows.

  • His life is the object of the Fifth;

  • the honour of his body as well as the source of life, of the Sixth;

  • his lawful possessions, of the Seventh;

  • his good name, of the Eighth;

  • And in order to make him still more secure in the enjoyment of his rights, it is declared an offense against God to desire to wrong him, in his family rights by the Ninth;

  • and in his property rights by the Tenth."
"The Ten Commandments are precepts bearing on the fundamental obligations of religion and morality and embodying the revealed expression of the Creator's will in relation to man's whole duty to God and to his fellow-creatures."

We are invited brothers and sisters to penetrate into the readings; we need to appreciate how an ordinary Israelite could have thought the gravity of the words of the Law. In so doing, we can appreciate how much an ordinary Jew during the time of Jesus could not help but wonder on how Jesus could ascribe to Himself the Law. We can at least appreciate the weight of the feelings of the Sadducees and Pharisees upon hearing Jesus.

Monday, June 14, 2010

Various Thoughts at Different Times

A Not Forgetful Past

The first and early years of which my recollection can bring me calls to mind spaces of lands and lush green, verdant in all surrounds. This was a day in the 1980s, when the world I see is somewhat in a dream. The environment I saw was lush with green. The verdant surrounding is a dry contrast to the world I have seen now. I was standing in a bluff, overlooking the rice fields down below, while the smoke was billowing on my grandmother's house; she must have been cooking something. It rises amidst the ever thickening outgrowths of the rising coconut trees. This was around 5pm; the gathering dusk is enveloping whatever light there was as the sun was concealed from the hill facing the hillside I was standing. I was waiting for my cousin to appear right below the sloping and descending pathway; she was gathering the goats before leading them to the dual-purpose barn and dryer. In the coming days, the barangay would celebrate its annual fiesta, as the people started to buy in provisions and ingredients of the menus already planned.

It was almost like a different world than what I have seen now. The house had been torn down, as easily as the fire could consume it in a blink of an eye. The pathway had been clogged by the overgrowths of years of neglect as the thick bushes and hedges crept into the clearing. Just the inhabitants of the place had left it, the ambience followed suit. It is as if the dead had made its abode, while the living have fled into different directions, promising to flee from it for good.


Genesis 30:1-2, Isaiah 49:15, Ephesians 6:4-4, and Luke 14:26 on Motherhood

In the readings, our reflection opens with the book of Genesis on the account of Rachel's demand for a child: "when...saw that she bore no children, she became jealous of her sister...". She puts a consequential factor in her state: "or I shall die". This is representative of how the ancient world views the state of a barren womanhood: the gods had receded its gift on you. In one way, that retreat of grace and help is perceived as a curse, seen in a negative sense. From the mouth of Rachel, we see that it is the death of her being if she bore no genetic inheritance of her husband's family. The role of woman in the age of the ancients is fundamentally to extend the family line, or the family risked to totally disappear. But, in this case, the family had been secured genetically by the children of Leah. This is not so much of having the progeny as to the personal condition of Rachel of being barren. Also, the abundance is seen in the children among women in that time. In the Genesis account Jacob retorted in a somewhat irked manner. It was not his will that God would give none to her. We would suspect that this incessant asking of Rachel had annoyed Jacob. This is, indeed, an urgent situation for Rachel for she believes that death could come to her. In a certain sense, what the second reading is teaching us is a word of hope for the demand of Rachel: the prophet wrote: "yet though she forget, I will never forget you". What Rachel had conceived as death of her own being is answered by the loyalty of God to His own children. He knows us: a knowing of us that knows us from end to last, from the deepest longing to the flimsy, superficial wants. If we read the text before the one quoted, Zion claimed that God had forgotten her, which had to be answered by the prophet in maternal terms. This also shows that the God of Israel is a nourishing and caring deity, a God who is neither strictly father nor mother, but is both at the same time. In one being of Israel's God is both the essence of a strong paternal character that subdues the enemies and shows His power of His own commands, while at the same is a God who comes with open arms to care our needs and heal our wounds.

The third reading from the letter of Paul to the first Christians of Ephesus is a strongly worded admonition of children to obedience that is first before the second one was given for the parents. St. Paul says to the children of Ephesus "...obey your parents for this is right" and is connected to its first cause: "this is the first commandment that has promise". The latter is the first principle for it comes from the command of God from Horeb, the mountain from which the Law has come. From the mouth of Yahweh is the cause of the Law, and from it is our own obedience. In the dynamics of the three scriptural citations, we can say that the immanent orientation of temporal situations and demands of our family can be channeled to our relationship with the Lord, who sustains us all. We may not worry what comes to us in the most uncertain circumstances, in the barrenness and sterility of our life-projects and plans for His promise in the words of the prophet Isaiah is a seal of hope, a trustworthy vow and pledge of the Giver of the Law. In the brokenness of our failures, God comes not as a father with a stern countenance but a mother with a hand that touches. We do not shrink from force and look to the ground of fear, but look our gaze up to meet His in the coming of our own salvation.

The Gospel reverses what we normally conceives as the usual scheme of things, the paradigm of the world. Jesus demands nothing short of a central focus of discipleship: "if you come to me, without being ready to give up your love for your ....". This is fundamental in understanding our obedience of Jesus Christ, who sets limits of our earthly ideal. The Lord bisects what love we can give to ourselves and others with that of the love we can give to Him, who is the source of love itself. Does Jesus need us to forsake even ourselves to come to Him, or there is another way of explaining it? One way for sure, the Law itself is clear as to the demands of the fourth commandment: to honor the father and mother, just as St Paul was clear when he admonished the children of Ephesus; however, the fourth command serves the first three of the Decalogue. In that orientation, how we honor our parents flows from the bidding of God to honor Him first. What counts now is the obedience demanded by Jesus from us? Is this valid though he himself shows us the countenance of a human being. We need to jump, then, from looking Jesus from man to being a god, and not just a god, but the God. We need to understand that the transposition of this obedience was hard for the first disciples as they hear the words. It is not without astonishment to hear the words as first time in our ears: the command was incisive, it cuts the very fabric of our society, the garment that holds us together, and the institution of our civilization. But didn't He say that " seek first the kingdom of God and everything will be given unto you"?

When we seek God and follow Him is a path that leads always to goodness and truth. Though the words of Jesus is hard and harsh, but what lurks within is the essence of motherhood, the countenance of a maternal demand that ushers us to a better way of understanding things and living it in reality. We do not gain the whole world, if we embrace it; we, therefore, gain it when we forsake it and lead our path to Him who gives everything: "what profits a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul". This is the irony of life - we do not rest content of what life is imposing us, the contentment of a pacified living beyond the taint of the exacts of the Gospel.

The dynamics of the Gospel vis-a-vis the three scriptural readings points eventually to the Church in sojourn. The Church, the spouse of Christ, bears and births Her children for Christ. In her is the nourishment of the flowing waters of redemption through Her sacraments. It is only in Her that the demands of Christ is intelligible and is shown with a face for the world to see. It is in Her saints that the acerbic taste of His commands is given life and blood.

Wednesday, October 21, 2009

Medical Testing Laboratories

I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The narrative features a Maryland-based medical laboratory known as Medical Testing Laboratories in its journey from manual system of database collection and requisition to automation of the whole laboratory system, including billing and invoicing. The narrated events by those who have been the primary actors that would eventually generate the required database tool like the administrators and managers and programmer of the company give us a full picture of this transition. What has been underscored in the recollection of these people is the crux that led the whole change.

Medical Testing Laboratories was founded by Dr. Healy to address the laboratory problem around Baltimore area. This need was on "comprehensive, emergency toxicology services" by the local medical community, whose specimes were sent initially to the local morgue for analysis and later shipped to Philadelphia General Hospital for more analysis. The whole proces was time-consuming and costly, which has debilitating effect as delayed tretments and lengthy hospitalizations.

Seeing these factors at hand, the originator of a loca llaboratory thought that his plan would "avoid these extra hospital costs and thus provide a significant and measurable contribution to the containment of health-care costs". And the facility was formally incorporated into th state of mayland in December of 1986.

The initial capitalizatin was provided by thirty-two pathologists who composed the stockholders on an equal-share basis. The incorporation has been designed to be non-profit and self-supporting, and the stocks pay no dividends. "Any operating profits are returned to the corporation in the form of expanded services and/or reduced charges.

By the end of 1987, the company was the first which opened its services to Baltimore Metropolitan Hospital community offering comprehensive emergency toxicology servies. The committed goal has always been "Quality, Services, and Economy".

Between 1987 to 1993, the company experienced a steady growth and it moved to a newly constructed 24,000-square-foot site and along with this was the stiff competition from other growing companies.

The detection of the need of automation was not palpable until 1995, when Joyce Windsor voiced her resentment at the whole manual system. This caught the attention of the founder to whom the concern was addressed. And, by July of 1997, the whole project jumpstarted when John Contreras the client services manager ran a client feedback campaign concerning satisfaction with the requisitioning and reporting formats. The result was client dissatisfaction. Though begrudging, Dr. Healy had consented and supported the project, and the board approved it in August of 1997.

In October of 1997, the project programmer Michael recommended the purchase of Data General Corpratin Aviion server attached to the lab's local area network. The system came with 128mB of memory, a 30-gB disk drive, a DG/UX Unix operating system with a license for up 50 users and a C++ programming language compiler. From then on, Michael came up with the program geared toward complete automation of the whole laboratory procedures and services.


II. ANALYSES
A. Major/Main Problem

The primary problem of the study is to find the appropriate automation tool in the database collection and entry of test results and eventually the release of these laboratory test information to the patients in short turnaround time.

B. Objectives

a. To be able to come up with an automated system of database where collected specimen information is entered, thereby automatically organizes the data collected.
b. To be able to use the automated system for a short turnaround time.
c. To be able to use the automated system for an accurate collection
and procedure, and entry of test results on the specific patients.

C. Point of View

With the stiff competition now in the market of independent laboratory services, the need of database automation has been the challenge for a speedy turnaround time between data collection and result generation. This has a significant effect on two things: the lengthy hospitalization costs and treatment delays. Along with this need is the issue of privacy of patient information, which the literature from which the study is derived, has been basically underscored. Initially, the goal was to come up with an appropriate database tool for data collection, information retention, and generation of test results to the patients in a shortened time-span.

The importance of automated database system could not have been more than appropriate considering that the complex laboratory tests and procedures together with the demand of the clinical market for an expanded services and growing patient population. The requirement now is the shortened duration of these laboratory tests and procedure results to quickly address diseases and lessen the costs and length of hospitalizations.

D. Alternative Courses of Action

1. Manual entry of data test results.
Pros:
a. Higher turn-around time
b. Higher risk of error of data input
c. Higher number of persons involved in data entry
d. Increased pressure on employee accuracy
e. Increased turnover rate
f. Increased price

Cons:
a. Retention of the established reputation of being trustworthy of the company
b. Less risk for breach of privacy and more secure to confidential info
c. More direct and personal contact with patients
d. Less systems problems

E. Critical Analysis

The factors surrounding the need for automation brought by an increased population of clients, hence an increased number of specimens and samples, have demanded a computerized tool for a speedy generation of results, as this has direct result on the cost of hospital stay and clinical decisions by medical practitioners. The times have come that quick communication through the internet has brought pressure on all areas of life, and nowhere it more especially felt than in the area of laboratory medicine. On the downside is the risk of information confidentiality breach - an area which the company has always tried to minimize. Dr. Healy the founder of the Medical Testing Laboratories has built and expanded the company on the trust the clients have rendered on them.

The costly hospitalization and the delay treatment may be partially hinged on the duration of test result generation, since any clinical decisions would require full view of the pathological state of the patient. A good clinical diagnosis has a direct relationship to specific treatment and procedure. Misdiagnosis will have financial and prophylactic repercussions.

The computerized database system produced should be organized along the usual lines of toxicological tests, as the company has been largely catering specimen population to this kind. Computerization and automation is the best technological means in the market to meet the demand of growing need of fast laboratory results.


F. Recommendations

My recommendation revolves on the database program that would have multi-level toxicological tests aside from the usual demographic profiling. After the usual filling out of the primary information of the patients, test worksheets would print out after each specific tests are clicked on. After the tests have been completed and results were generated, it would be entered on the program, which could be sent electronically to the client hospital. Within this framework, there could be a need for another medical technologist to double-check manual errors.

G. Program Plan of Action

The study seeks to address the fundamental problem of quick and reliable generation and transmission of test results to client-patients by generating a program of such this kind. After a thorough analysis of the problem, the study could come up with what we can call Specimen Control System or SCS. This kind of program is practical but sophisticated to sort out data and exclude possibilities mishandling and erroneous result entry. It is designed to be 99-percent error free program, since it has a state-of-the-art edit-checks.

This test automation can start with gamma counter of radioimmunoassay will be interfaced with Data General using a protocol conversion program in C++ programming language. The Data General will perform the usual mathematical calculations, summations, graph generation, and automatic printing.


III. Reflection

The whole process of identifying the problem and the eventual production of the specific database program requires a tailored response. Since the company requires a fast transmission of test results, it should also have a parallel responsive tool to meet the requirements. It is not to downplay the fact that this technology requires constant perfection as time wears on.

Though how advance it may become in the future, still, this may be subjected to electrical downtime and system maintenance, which may still call for manual process. In any case, the need of fast communication of important data and results remains the top goal in this fast-paced world. It is hoped that with this technology, it would partially help lowering down the cost of long hospital stay and fast clinical decision-making.






















Sunday, March 8, 2009

The Sacred and the Profane

Man's transcedental consciousness is not limited to an elite few. Everyone at some point in his life experiences an immanent presence of a completely absolute being. And, I think this has a religious bent, which our Judeo-Christian experience has always taught us, that has its beginnings on the pages of Genesis. When, indeed, the creator has given us life, He breathed us not a simple word as air or wind but a spirit, a spirit that gives life in an otherwise an only material substance. It is as if that divine spiration is one step to making us divine ourselves. That giving off of the life has awakened that materiality of a substance devoid of essence. Ever since that locus of beginning, history sprung to life where the apex of all created order had given reality what could have been inconceivable had creation been devoid of its existence! Man can rise up to apprehend the divine realm, which was his own in the beginning.

Since the making, no one could be an exception to that which the inception of beginning has in it in the first. That is why the domineering feeling of a God is always felt, which no one in his finite being could exempt. The stark consciousness of having to end in this life propels us to accept our limitations, and beyond all boundaries of life is an abyss of darkness which inevitably constantly invites us to reflect. My concept of a God did not stem from a dreadful anticipation of end but in the beauty inherent in faith. The vocal prayers of those of whom I have lived with and the spontaneity of a pious and simple believer had early in my life been a overbearing memory, which keeps on repeating everytime. The aesthetics of the liturgy had become my source of encounter of someone whom I know could not be seen. The potency of the Church's tradition of doing things and the existence of timelessness could not be shaken off just easily. In one of a Good Friday processions in my old town in Bohol, the symbolism of an age-old tradition just seize you with a feeling that what goes on right before you is an amazing work of faith. The crowd, the anticipation, the prayers, the incenses, the murals of the ceiling, the starking contrast of the chandeliers bursting with light against the pressing darkness of an eight o'clock evening, the statues borne on platforms of shoulders innumerable to count is incomparably the call of faith.
In my young days, I would ask my lola what their experience of Catholicism then. Here, it is seen where culture is transformed as faith imbues the people with the spirit, which is its own. It is as if that the epicenter of their lives revolves around the Church. Their whole horizon parallels the whole liturgical cycle of the Church. They perfectly knew the feasts and the special holidays of obligations. They had almost memorized the prayers, which govern their time. Her two aunts, who were specially religious in their religous observances, would wake up around 3:00 early in the morning to begin their prayers (The Trisagio). Sunday masses were always days obedience. It became a routine, a cyclical, revolution centered on the Church. This cycle became their identity and in return gives them life. Is it not, then, a clear manifest of what we have called liturgical life?

There were prayers of the dead, which became a specialized area in itself. Coupled with this practice are the nebulous beliefs of the afterlife, of the homes and abodes of the spirits, and of the eccentricities of different personages, who either had gone ahead or were their contemporaries. The color of these accounts weaved a kind of relationship, a kind of pattern which at the center is faith that did not become foreign and alien to the whole thing. It was even poignant to hear that even in the church there were some stories of fairies, giants, and dwarves. These narratives became accepted in the consciousness of the people themselves that it soon became automatic accounts of the past whenever there are family or social gatherings and events. There was an account of my lola where the patroness had to be borne on a procession to dispel the plague brought by cholera. When she shared this, it came to me alive but like a very old picture streaming across my mind. The general association of the account made a coherence with the geographical place this occured. The way the mountains and the valleys give a backdrop of the countless stories of processions, masses, liturgical events, political caucuses, governmental occasions, scandals, mysteries, and on could never be wanting in any way.

The place that bred my faith and that of so many others becomes no ordinary place of one whose existence is but a part. And, the different architectural realities are a great contribution to the existence of this faith. Plus, the fact that this faith grows in a community of sanguine relations or in different family stocks is all the more an impulse of its thriving from within. The topographical beauty does not become an antagonistic force within the whole history of the place but a constant reminder of it. The economy, which the land had imposed upon its possessors, births practices and customs that adumbrates the profile of the people of Loon. But, we must not forget, however, the bleak of history, the smear of time.

However, the passage of time poses a danger to the cultural fabric. The vitriolic effectuality of liberal and progressive ideas, which are radical in the simple eyes of the Oriental people, may gave way to a general consciousness akin to alienation. The European Reformation gave way to the Enligtenment, which had shaken the concept of unity of life. The essence of this European event is the centerpiece of reason above all else. The questioning mind looks on the horizon with a heavy eye of doubt and skepticism - foremost for which is on the Christian religion with its dogma and doctrine. The idea of unassailable beliefs and tenets had to be deconstructed through perspicuous and rigorous logical reasoning. The end result of which might not be friendly to the propositions of faith and could be devastatingly negative to it. It should be noted that this kind of tool to achieve a result of understanding faith to the best human way possible was the primary characteristic of Medieval Catholicism; it was an endemic spirit that governs the theological schools of Italy, Germany, France, Spain, and England. In that, philosophy was used to achieve a desired result of putting in arguments in logical form using deduction and induction the faith with all that it entails that was "once and for all given to the saints". But the post-reformation world had put a wedge on the unitive vision of Catholicism. The so-called reformers in their plight to go back to the simple teachings of the gospel had destroyed in their religious ideas the development of doctrine and faith and traditions as time unfolds. A progression idea of faith that does not annihilate the past but built on it.

These tumultous ideas only trickled so slowly in the Philippine Church, though early traces of which could be seen on the advent of American Protestantism. But today, the coming of evangelical missionary activities have denoted this idea of devaluation and deconstruction of Catholic concept of society, and the conclusion of the Second Vatican Council gave impetus to religious freedom. Were the concept developed early on among Protestant churches and the ideas expounded of the last General Council compatible with Filipino faith? As a matter of fact, since there was a general acceptance, though not without any resistance from some, it was integrated by Filipino faithful. But as a matter of principle, it was not conducive to the way naturally Filipinos sees faith: for the oriental world, there is unity of reality that transgresses the natural and supernatural realms. The supernatural entity that punctures the natural domain has given rise to the way both spheres interact. In the Philippine society, their consciousness that spirits abode in the woods, trees, mounds, fields, areas, animals, and water bodies could not sit well with instrinsic and inherent belief born on Greek logic. However, the concept of Catholicism itself encompasses not just the lofty heights of reason but also the feelings and sentiments of mystical theology, then the appearance of cerebral faith did not kill the acceptance of a newness of a vision of faith brought by Vatican II.

With these high fallutin stratospheric Christian categories that ushered a new era for the Church, it might not appear to have radically incited a rebellion among Filipino churchgoers, though in many an instance, as my grandmother had observed, most have truly wondered. It was from the Sacred Liturgy that most felt the change: where the priest said his vocal prayers by himself and facing the altar, now the presider faces the congregants and heard audibly; where the sanctuary is a place where the priests and ordained ministers or sacristans are enclosed, now there is "human traffic" of lay persons, who have been consecrated as extraordinary ministers of the Eucharist. These and all did appear to many that the Church has been changed. The "secularization" of the Liturgy to advocate an inclusive attitude in the Church has a tragic outcome. No longer has the world seen something that compels them to renewal, but that in the effort of the theologians to offer Christ, it has lost the essential uniqueness of Christian revelation and salvation. The general attitude of today's population is not a flight toward Christ but that Christ should come to them to understand man. The pervasive indifferentism and ignorance of common Catholics to the teachings of Christ and the Scriptures is at its face very laughable and sometimes stupid to hear. There is also a great danger among Christians to cower in the event where a situation calls for intervention for witnessing the Gospel. Oftentimes, one feels that fear of giving account to the faith of which we have been given in the face of growing societal scepticism. But at one end, at other times, we feel that the abandonment of the world and the isolationism of modern societies has created people with harrowing emptiness that few existential questions would slip in conversations and dialogue. It is palpable that fear of the beyond and the now is a groping reality amidst the noise of today. It is here where the Gospel is at most successful and audible in the hearts of those who suffer internally.

This extended observation is not circumscribed in Western societies. It is beginning to affect Filipinos. By analogy, can we not ask if the reduccion the Spanish friars introduced in the Philippines did bring something beneficial? Lawrence Cunnigham in his book The Catholic Experience discussed the elements of which Catholicism has always been featured of. One of these is space. In this specific chapter, he observes that whenever one comes into a church something different happens: from the noise of the outside world comes the silence of a church, which becomes a different environment that invokes a different perspective. It no longer is mundane but heavenly. Going back to the the reduccion, a sociological terminology applied by historians on the process implemented by the friars in gathering scattered population into one circumscribed are within a geographical pattern. Looking into the common patterns of Philippine towns, one can always take note that the Church, the municipal hall, the town plaza, the market, and the residential areas are arranged in typical way. If we were to take more notice on this, it would seem to us that the call of dispersed units come together as one whole. What then becomes a call of Christ to gather the children of Israel, of the gathering of wheat and vine, becomes in a unique and concrete way manifested in the building up of a community. The presence of a priest whose features are all the more repelling against the background of the community to which he is bound by Christ create a tension between what he represents and the hitorical circumstance of the people. It speaks of a Gospel in contact with pure nature that it seeks to purify. But a call should be heard, whose need of a caller is given by the one who sent. In a way, the Church whose bosom bears the promise has to radiate this gift of salvation to ends of the land. At the center is placed the church whose belfry calls the distant persons beckoning them to come and drink from the wellspring of life. Is it not the case that the Gospel is an energy that summons the souls and hearts of those who hear the sound of the bells? Is it not that the hearts spring with joy when music is heard from the bellows of the organ and the strings of notes scatters in all directions? The road to the town is a road to peace; the peace that is seen in the measurements and dimensions of the elements of the physical structure of the community. The way the town is arranged evokes the presence of tranquility that points to a community in the City of God, in the Holy City of Jerusalem. The Catholic magic crisscrosses the boundaries of what is supernatural from the natural, the mundane and heavenly.

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

Communist Manifesto

Introduction
The Communist Manifesto was born from the minds of two Germans: Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. The corpus was addressed to all workingmen, by all accounts to Europe more concretely. This work could never be more intelligible than the milieu it has been borne: the Romantic Age of Europe, which is general cultural term, whose main soul is change. There are different aspects and shades under this epoch, from political to art, from philosophy to religion. In the European economy, it was also the age of industrialisation, the capitalization of European societies; while in the social sphere, nationalism is its main spirit. The popular work has "four chapter of decreasing importance", and the first chapter on "Bourgeois and Proletarians" is crucial. In the succeeding chapters, the two authors had expounded on the historical and social realities, which might service as the platform of communism to rise.

Principle Integrated by the Government.
Communism by nature has in its constitution that inherent class struggle before a social change occurs, thereby inversing the social order inhereted from feudalism, through the rise of capitalism. In the contemporary society, taking the historical-material dialecticism of communism, in which world history is brought to existence by the synthesis of two antithetical realities inhereted from the past to the fermenting reality of the present, present governments, like the Philippines, has combined this reality subsuming it within the framework of constitutional democracy by putting it under the control of the laws governing labor and commerce. This alienation is mitigated along the process of protecting the workers' rights in the larger concept of human rights. The idea of inversion of social stratum from landed aristocracy and nobility to upward movement and control of the working class, whereby what is individually owed is common to all, does not remain as an abstract concept by acknowledged and integrated well within the democratic societies. The Free Speech right guarantees the existence of the ideas of communism, though it does not condone the inherent revolutionary nature of radical Critical-Utopian Socialism. The existence of labor unions is one of the manifestation of free market societies to communist critiques.


Principles Not Integrated in Government
The critique of Marx and Engels against bourgeois society is a critique to what they believe as the institutional effects of such a society. Fundamental to this is the form of government that western societies have, and in the course of history, the Philippine society has acquired from the western colonial powers: Constitutional Democracy poses a threat and has to be transcended by a socialist society. The inherent principle itself of class antagonism, which communists have thoroughly defended, does not suit well intrinsically with the kind of democratic society we have. Central to constitutional democracy is the presupposition of private property; individuals have the right to own something out from their own labors. In the language of communism, this does not exist because "no sooner is the exploitation of the laborer by the manufacturer, so far, at an end, that he receives his wages in cash, than he is set upon by the other portions of the bourgeoisie, the landlord , the shopkeeper, the pawnbroker, etc". Then the tautology is inevitable: "the increase of labor is the increase of capital". The virtual existence of bourgeois is the "formation and augmentation of capital". For the integrity of the whole idea of Marx and Engles to survive, it has to find conditions that grounds it to prosper and develop. And, that is to supersede capitalism, because it has failed to satisfy the demands of alienation subjectively and class struggle socially in a materialistic and economic sense.

Concluding Remarks
The nature of the concept of Communism and Socialism may have accentuated and underlined more the social and class struggles in economic terms to the detriment of who man really is in the larger reality of his nature, which he gave a detailed arguments on human emancipation. From this struggle, he posits a change of society, whereby man is emancipated from the fetters that strangulate him in his potentiality. Reading European history and thought and the signs of his time, nothing is perfect abstract idea of alienation truer than the concrete fact of the societies of Industrial Revolution; the abhorrent relationship between labor and capital is an example of a materialistic estrangement that enslaves man. From the terminology of labor in actuality in free markets, it has to be transposed in political language to create a ground of existence for a communistic society to rise, and in the process, a revolution, not just a concept of radical change as espoused by conservative or bourgeois socialism, is necessary to inverse the existent social mode through coercive means and instrumentation. Even Marx had to give space to a dictator to stabilize everything before such society comes. However, the whole grand idea failed to satisfy the word freedom itself. The solution only made the concept of freedom more difficult. Socialist states has not made that realize as perfectly as it has been expounded by its great mind originators. What has succumbed capitalism as its weakness becomes the same evil that hounds communism.

Thursday, January 15, 2009

John Stuart Mill

Introduction
John Stuart Mill is one of the most influential philosophers who rose in the 19th century Britain. He is an economist, political and moral theorist, and an administrator, who was greatly influenced by his Jonathan Bentham through his father, James Mill. Born in Pentoville, then a suburb of London, he had been schooled in the classics and was able read them in Greek and Latin by the age of fourteen and had done extensive study on mathematics and the basics of economic theories. He had been schooled in the associationist school of Bentham. By the age of 15, he had undertaken the study of the various fragment of Bentham's theory of legal evidence. This had a deep effect on his on goal of reforming the world for the interest of human beings. He began working in a junior position in the East India Company, and he eventually landed on to become the Chief Examiner. In 1820, he became acquainted of French thought and history during his visit there. Six years after, he suffered great depression, which his reading of Wordsworth's poetry had ameliorated greatly. He had been educated in the strict and rigorous intellectual analysis, which hampered his capacity of emotions.

He began to appreciate the role that cultural and social institutions in the historical development of human beings from his readings of French thinkers. From reading Comte came the idea that "social change proceeds through critical periods, in which old institutions are overthrown, followed by organic periods - a stage of consolidation and social cohesion that began to emerge. He proposed that social change be in a piece-meal fashion; grand schemes for philosophy could not be offered to avoid being viewed radical. Only gradually will the principles be proposed. He did not advocate destroying existing forms but had to get the best of it to incorporate on the new.

The philosopher had greatly acknowledged the contribution the woman in his life gave - Harriet Taylor, a woman whom he married after the latter got widowed. Under the extreme disapproval of his family, he married the woman, who would greatly influence him in his philosophical proclivity. Later in his life, he got involve in politics and ended it when he failed to be re-elected in 1868.

He published System of Logic, The Principles of Political Economy, Examination of Sir William Hamilton's Philosophy, Considerations and Representative Government, The Subjection of Women, and partially-finished Autobiography. But he is well-known to publishing the work entitled On Liberty and Utilitarianism.

The overall picture of his philosphy lies in his constant view of the positivity of the universe and the place of humans in it, in which one contributes to the progress of human knowledge and individual freedom and human being. Though his views are entirely original but he gave depth to the works of celebrated philosophers who lived before him: Locke, George Berkeley, and David Hume.

Principles Prevalent in the Government
There are many principles enunciated by this political theorist, which have been integrated in present Philippine government. The first of these is the freedom of speech. As has been known, John Mill was a strong advocate for free discourse and expression. His argument is that free speech is a "necessary condition for intellectual and social progress". And that silenced opinion may contain a grain of truth, which deserves to be heard. He contends that there are primarily two reasons for which opinion deserves to be expressed: first, "individuals are more likely to abandon erroneous beliefs if they are engaged in an open exchange of ideas; second, by forcing other individuals to re-examine and re-affirm their beliefs in the process of debate, these beliefs are kept frm declining into mere dogma".

Another important expounded by the British philosopher is on the "harm principle". It holds that "each individual has the right to act as he wants, so long as these actions do not harm others". The only exception is when actions are self-regarding: when the individual only affects himself and no others. In this case, the society does not have any responsibility to intervene. He further elaborated the principle well within the framework on his discussion of liberty - "the sole end for which mankind are warranted, individually or collectively, in interfering with the liberty of action of any of their number, is self-protection. That the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others."

The third and fourth principles Mill had greatly contributed so much for liberal political theory are social liberty and tyranny of majority. The former has been defined by the author as "as protection from the tyranny of political rulers", while the latter is "a desire of a people to oppress a part of their number; and precautions are as much needed against this, as against any other abuse of power". These two rules have been subserved in his discussion of the nature of liberty in his book "On Liberty", where he explores the relationship between liberty and authority.

In the controversy surrounding the issue of slavery in the fledgling United States, the J. S. Mill did not fail to notice the ethical implication of this moral issue. He sent a letter without his name titled "The Negro Question" in which he derided the position of Thomas Carlyle, another British political thinker and controversialist, whose position on the matter points on genetic inferiority of the blacks and the engenuity of the British to be successful in their trade of slavery in improving the economy.

The last of the principles, which this political thinker had been popularly associated with, is utilitarianism, which he heavily was influenced by the thoughts of Jeremy Bentham, a British legal thinker, whom his father had pound on him, when he was still young. This has been usually encapsulated famous formulation "greatest happiness principle". It holds that an action should produce the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. He further qualitatively divided and separation pleasures: "It is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig satisfied; better t obe Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied. And if the fool, or the pig, are of a different opinion, it is because they only know their own side of the question."

Principles To Be Integrated to Philippine Government

Here I will cite one principle, which needs to be greatly integrated in the present governance: the prevention of the Tyranny of Majority. This tyranny make take several forms in Philippine life, and without our knowing it, it might have contributed to some of the disastrous social effects of Filipinos. In the Spanish days, it was the tyranny of the majority in power, who perpetuated the status quo to avoid freedom given over to the Indios. In the American rule, it was the majority of American ideals that intoxicated the universities, whose ideas hampered in any way from seeing ourselves as distinct capable of ruling ourselves. The post-war years saw Filipinos emerging from the dictates of a western capitalist government to a fledgling republic, which had displayed hints and traces of emerging corruptive government. Marcos regime saw a consolidation of power in a strongman rule, whose presidency culled a few majority, who virtually run the whole economy. We have yet to deserve that majority rule, whereby the principle of social liberty dictates the majority's will on to the bars of power and serves each individuals who comprise that political society by securing first and foremost self-protection from the caprice from without.

CONCLUSION.
The principles mentioned above are lofty in their heights but deserve to be seen in their actuality. They don't remain an ideal but a goal to be reached and be done. What "ought to be" becomes "is to be" in the experience of ordinary Filipinos. The least that we can afford is an indifferentism that runs across age brackets, in a total absorption of skepticism to change social institutions. That has to be checked or else we don't secure the future of our republic.